Use case · Documents

Document processing AI cost guide

Document AI stacks combine OCR, chunking, embeddings, and LLM summarization. Tokens accumulate across stages, so isolate each stage in your ledger.

Token patterns in document pipelines

Long PDFs can span multiple LLM calls if you chunk. Each chunk adds overhead instructions—keep chunk templates short.

Processing scenarios

Scenario Prompt tokens Output tokens Model (est.) Cost / request
Contract clause map 12000 900 Claude 3.5 Sonnet $0.0495
Invoice field extract 3500 400 GPT-4o $0.0128
Daily news digest 6000 500 gemini-2.5-flash $0.0006

Figures use rates from config/models.php; confirm against your provider before billing decisions.

Monthly estimates

  • Back-office batch

    350 large docs per weekday.

    Per request
    $0.0383
    Monthly (350 req/day × 22 days)
    $294.53

Infrastructure considerations

Object storage, OCR vendors, and GPU preprocessing belong in the same business case as LLM tokens.

Model recommendations

Use flash/mini tiers for first-pass extraction and premium models for adjudication.

Optimization recommendations

Deduplicate documents, store intermediate JSON, and avoid re-sending unchanged sections.

ROI examples

Compare manual review hours avoided versus model cost—legal and finance teams often have ready hourly benchmarks.

Budget guidance

Pilot with stratified samples across document types so medians reflect messy real-world scans.

FAQ: Document AI pricing

Short answers mirror the structured data on this page for search engines and readers.

Do embeddings count as LLM tokens?
Embedding models have their own pricing—track them separately from chat completions.
How does chunk overlap affect cost?
Overlap duplicates tokens across calls—minimize overlap while preserving context.
What about handwritten notes?
OCR quality impacts retries; budget higher completion variance.
Can on-device OCR reduce bills?
It can reduce cloud OCR fees but may shift engineering costs—compare holistically.

Calculate document LLM costs

Tune prompt tokens to reflect average pages ingested per job.

Prefilled for this page’s scenario. Pricing loads from config/models.php and /api/pricing.

Calculator

Cost = (prompt ÷ 1000 × Pin) + (completion ÷ 1000 × Pout), then × requests.

Usage presets

Multi-model comparison

Toggle models to compare the same workload. The cheapest option is highlighted.

Monthly cost simulator

Project from average daily requests (uses tokens above).

Uses primary model rates for projections.

Token estimator

Rough heuristic: ~4 characters ≈ 1 token for Latin text (indicative only).

Estimated tokens: 0 · Cost @ primary:

API budget planner

Set a monthly cap to see how many identical requests fit (primary model).

Max requests (approx):

Prompt optimization analyzer

Collapse whitespace and tighten wording to preview savings at the primary model.

Suggested shorter form:


                    

Token delta: 0 · Est. savings / 1k calls:

Fine-tuning cost sketch

Order-of-magnitude helper: training tokens × epochs × rate + storage.

Est. training + 1 mo storage:

Team usage calculator

Multiply per-person daily volume by team size (primary model).

Team monthly (22d):

Cost per feature

Price a single product surface (e.g., one chat turn or one generated article).

Uses prompt & completion tokens from the calculator for one invocation.

Cost per use: · Monthly @ that cadence:

Share & export

Serialize inputs in the URL hash or copy a text summary.

Calculation history

Stored in your browser only (LocalStorage).